New Receipting Changes Beginning Nov. 11

We are pleased to announce a new feature for fundholders to receive electronic notifications when new contributions are posted. Instead of receiving hardcopy receipts, donors who have an active email address on file with us will be sent an alert when contribution receipts are available online. An email will be sent as soon as the contribution has been posted to the fund, giving our donors faster access to their documents. This new service will take effect November 11. If you would prefer to continue to receive your contribution receipts through US Mail, please contact Jonathan at jharrison@servantchristian.com.

This change will not affect givers who already receive their statements in the US Mail, and friends or supporters who give to another’s fund will continue to receive paper statements.

Upgrades such as these help the foundation wisely allocate limited resources. In 2008 alone, 4,060 receipts were mailed (approximately 78 per week). These upgrades also allow donors faster access to their documents in a securer format.

Upcoming Events: Passion Awards!

Faith_Unleashed_BannerWhat would it look like if we chose to unleash our faith?

Join us for the 2009 Passion Awards, one of the largest Christian ministry awards celebrations in the country!

Monday, November 9, 2009
6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m.
Pre-event and Registration begins at 5:30 p.m.
Overland Park Convention Center
6000 College Boulevard
Overland Park, Kansas

Early Bird Special
Register by October 15th for $650/table of 10 or $65/individual.
$750/table of 10 or $75/individual after October 15th.

registerevent

Giving in the News: NCF is AGAIN Fourth Largest DAF Provider

A article posted in the latest Chronicle of Philanthropy identifies Servant’s national affiliate, The National Christian Foundation out of Atlanta, GA, as the fourth largest provider of donor-advised funds (DAFs) in the nation. Each of the three programs larger than NCF are commercial funds associated with national investment firms.

The article highlights the fact that most DAF programs have been significantly impacted by the economic downturn, similarly to other charitable investments and endowments. Though NCF’s assets were down from previous years, a primary reason for this is the greater amount of grants going to ministries in greater need than most years. Many generous Christians have responded to the urgencies of the day by increasing their giving.

At Servant, we’ve seen giving increase YTD over 2008 by 17%. We’re excited to facilitate all giving, and have worked with givers to find creative ways to give a greater amount in 2009, even if extra cash isn’t available.

Further Facebook Thoughts

As I’ve thought more about how non-profits (and businesses in general) think of facebook, it’s struck me how many believe it’s the silver bullet that will bring in massive donation amounts or revolutionize their firm’s marketing. This just isn’t going to work. Success stories definitely flame the fire – where an agency is able to raise thousands of dollars through a tight campaign – but this is uncommon and usually has other factors. These factors should be studied and emulated. However, most people on facebook are primarily there for personal use, and this should affect how non profits use it.

I was speaking with a business consultant friend today who told me how he explains fb for his clients (who are not usually fb’s regular users): Facebook should be used in the same way that you build rapport if you were sitting in a client’s office. You ask about the kids framed on the desk, chat about the game coming up this weekend. These things make you seem human and personable. Since fb is inherently your audience’s personal space, you should use it to show that you too have a personality beyond work and your cause. If you don’t want any friends, then just post informational articles and promotional blurbs. Most people will breeze right past them. Instead, blend in pictures of your office having fun accomplish your mission. Be honest about how you feel about your day.

By showing your network of friends your personal side, you’ll still be keeping your mission in front of them but they’ll be paying attention.

To Facebook or Not to Facebook

We’ve been having a discussion in the office about whether or not SCCF needs a presence on Facebook. The concesus: yes, but how? I believe having an ineffectual or inactive social media presence may be more detrimental than not having one at all. As an active Facebook user, I’ve had good and bad experiences with nonprofits and social media.

With that in mind, I’m reading Beth’s Blog: How Nonprofits Can Use Social Media and gaining a few insights. They have quite a few examples, although the layout not the best. Still wrestling with how to apply it to our foundation – if you have a nonprofit, how are you using Facebook? If your a user, how would you like your nonprofits to connect with you?

How to Set Up a Giving Circle

One of the recent trends in giving is the rise of “Giving Circles” —individuals who come together to pool their assets to make a difference with their giving.

Setting up a Giving Circle is easy, and you may be surprised how meaningful it is to give among friends. Here are six basic steps to help you get started:

Step 1 – Set Goals and Structure
Identify a group of your peers, colleagues, or family members who may share a common interest and invite them to get together. Your first meetings will focus on setting up the Circle’s structure such as giving guidelines, meeting schedule, and deciding a name.

It is up to your group to determine the contribution amount that each member should make. There are circles that require $500, $5,000, or more in annual commitments. It is important for the group to have complete consensus on the final amount.

Step 2 – Establish Your Mission

Your group needs to decide which charities you would like to focus on. You may also wish to simply designate a general category, such as evangelism, inner city, youth, or poor and needy.

Step 3 – Open a Giving Fund
Your group can open a Fund at SCCF by making a suggested tax-deductable contribution of $2,500 or more.

Step 4 – Create Work Groups
Once your focus is established, having members volunteer for particular tasks will build personal commitment in your Circle. For example, one work group could organize meetings and Circle events, another could manage the Fund online (recommend grants, review Fund balances, etc.), while another might research new giving opportunities.

Step 5 – Develop Partnerships

Determine how you want to be involved with the organizations that you fund. Will you also volunteer for
an organization that you have funded? Web development, program planning, and mentoring are some examples of ways your members might get involved.

Step 6 – Evaluate Your Impact
Take time to examine your short-term and long-term goals on a regular basis. This will help develop a sense of satisfaction and show how your contributions are making a difference.

Candid feedback from the organizations you have funded and partnered with will always be an important ingredient of this process.
________________________________________
Original article by Pam Pugh, Copyright © 2008, The National Christian Foundation

Giving in the News: Community Foundations Fare Relatively Well During Recession, Report Says

Community foundations increased their giving in 2008, bucking the belt tightening that swept nearly all quarters of the philanthropic world, according to a new report by the Foundation Center.

More than 700 community foundations gave $4.6-billion last year, a 2.7 percent increase when adjusted for inflation. The increase outpaced the rate of growth reported by independent and corporate foundations and, for the first time on record, community foundations gave more money than corporate grant makers, the report said.

But with the country mired in the worst economic crisis since the 1930s, community foundations probably will not be able to maintain their level of generosity this year, according to the study. Nearly three-quarters of foundations surveyed said they anticipated giving less in 2009.

Still, community foundations are better positioned than some grant makers. A flurry of new donors and bequests, as well as strong increases in their asset values, have buoyed community foundations in recent years, according to the report.

What’s more, the sour economy may cause some philanthropists to scrap plans to set up separate, endowed institutions, which are expensive to operate, and instead create donor-advised funds with community foundations, the report said.

10% of Foundation Grants

The grant-making clout of community foundations exceeds their number, the study found. Community foundations accounted for 1 percent of the total number of grant makers in 2007, according to the report, but their giving made up 10 percent of all foundation grant dollars.

Like other types of foundations, they were more likely to support groups that help children and poor people than charities working in other fields.

Community foundations were more inclined, meanwhile, to provide general support than were other types of grant makers, the report said.

From The Chronicle of Philanthropy.  By Caroline Preston.  A free copy of the report can be downloaded from the Foundation Center’s Web site

Thine Eyes Documentary

This week Thine Eyes – A Witness to the March for Life is showing their documentary on their website, www.thineeyes.org, for free. Thine Eyes raised support through a donor-advised fund at SCCF, and has produced the movie to raise awareness for this annual pro-life event as well as the media’s intentional failure to publicize it.

Steve Sanborn, the executive producer for the film, posted the video online in response to Pro-life terrorism accusations resulting from the Tiller shooting. He says, “The murder of abortionist George Tiller cannot be condoned. Neither can accusations of Pro-life ‘terrorism’ be condoned. The crime of one unaffiliated man does not speak for the Pro-life Movement. But this documentary does…”

Additional info can be found on Thine Eyes website.

Study finds giving circles benefit members

A study titled “The Impact of Giving Together” looked at the effects of giving circles and found:

1. Giving circles influence members to give more.

2. Giving circles influence members to give more strategically.

3. Giving circle members give to a wide array of organizations.

4. Giving circle members are highly engaged in the community.

5. Giving circles increase members’ knowledge about philanthropy, nonprofits and the community.

Since its inception in 2000, Servant Christian has recognized the importance of giving circles and sponsors several. For more information on how you can get involved, send us an email at info@servantchristian.com. You can read the entire article highlighting the study here.

Giving in the news: Women Take the Lead in Couples’ Charitable-Giving Decisions

Women Take the Lead in Couples’ Charitable-Giving Decisions

Published May 19 in The Chronicle of Philanthropy

By Paula Wasley

Women are taking an increasingly prominent role in determining their household’s charitable giving, with high-income women in particular more likely to seek financial advice and use sophisticated methods when making donations, according to a new study sponsored by Fidelity Charitable Gift Fund.

An online survey of 1,000 adults who had given $1,000 or more to charity in 2007 — half of whom had donated $5,000 or more — found that more women than men act as their household’s primary decision maker in determining how much to donate to charity and which causes to support.

Among participants in the survey — 80 percent of whom were married — the majority of male respondents named their spouse as the primary influencer in charitable-giving decisions, while women in the study were more likely to name a range in influencers that included family members, friends, and co-workers.

Women in the survey also felt more strongly about involving their children in philanthropy. Nearly half of the women in the study (48 percent) strongly agreed that it was important to them that their children continue their tradition of charitable giving, as compared with 39 percent of men in the study.

Upper Tier

While the average household income for participants in the survey was $136,000, the study particularly looked at the giving habits of the 11 percent of respondents who were women with household incomes of at least $150,000.

The survey found that, in comparison to the other respondents, these high-income women were more likely to make public rather than anonymous gifts to charity, to use more complicated financial structures to make gifts, and to seek the guidance of financial advisors when making charitable contributions.

For example, 7 percent of women in this group said they had made gifts of securities to charity, as compared to 4 percent of all respondents, and 3 percent of men of comparable household incomes.

And 16 percent of high-income women said they had used a donor advised fund, charitable remainder trust, or a private foundation to make contributions, as compared with 9 percent of all donors, and 10 percent of high-income men.

High-income women were also more likely than others in the survey to donate to health and science causes and to make additional gifts to charity in response to increasing needs and difficult economic times, the survey found.

The survey’s findings offer insights into how women are likely to shape the future of philanthropy, says Sarah C. Libbey, Fidelity’s president. “Women have always had a hand in their household’s charitable outreach, but that role is evolving as women increasingly create their own wealth and become beneficiaries of wealth transfers because they live longer,” said Ms. Libbey, in a written statement. “We, and other nonprofit organizations, should pay more attention to this very influential group of donors.”

Researchers also grouped respondents into four distinct donor “profiles” based on their giving patterns and attitudes toward philanthropy.

The “mainstream contributor” — which accounted for 52 percent of those in the study — was less likely than others to increase giving in difficult economic times. And, when cutting back on the percentage of the household income contributed to charity, donors in this category tend to give to the same number of causes as in previous years but decrease the size of their gifts. Donors who fell into this category gave an average of $6,842 to charity in 2008.

Nearly a third of the respondents in the study were identified as “empathetic givers” who were more likely to give more in tough economic times and to respond to a cause when personally touched by illness or tragedy. Respondents in this group gave an average of $7,287 in 2008.

About 15 percent of those surveyed were described as “reactive contributors” who, in comparison to the other groups, give a smaller percentage of their household income to charity and are more likely to reduce their donations in difficult economic times. Total donations from individuals in this group averaged $3,687 in 2008.

Just 4 percent of respondents were identified as “pioneering givers.” Donors in this group gave away the highest percentage of their income to charity, were more likely to give to new and lesser-known causes, and more frequently used credit cards or securities to make donations. Individuals in this group gave an average of $7,347 to charity in 2008.